QTL for METH responses for home cage activity on Chr3 at Evi1 (30.85 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
METH responses for home cage activity spans 5.85 - 55.85 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr3. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
QTL for high-dose ethanol actions on Chr3 at D3Mit21 (39.41 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
high-dose ethanol actions spans 14.41 - 64.41 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr3. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
Authors:
Erwin VG, Markel PD, Johnson TE, Gehle VM, Jones BC
QTL for METH responses for home cage activity on Chr3 at Il2 (39.85 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
METH responses for home cage activity spans 14.85 - 64.85 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr3. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
QTL for ethanol conditioned taste aversion on Chr3 at D3Mc1 (47.70 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
ethanol conditioned taste aversion spans 22.70 - 72.70 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr3. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
QTL for ethanol withdrawal on Chr3 at D3Mc1 (47.70 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
ethanol withdrawal spans 22.70 - 72.70 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr3. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
The current study used two inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6 J and A/J, to investigate the genetics of behavioral responses to fentanyl. Mice were tested for conditioned place preference and fentanyl-induced locomotor activity. C57BL/6J mice formed a conditioned place preference to fentanyl injections and fentanyl increased their activity. Neither effect was noted in A/J mice. We conducted RNA-sequencing on the nucleus accumbens of mice used for fentanyl-induced locomotor activity. Surprisingly, we noted few differentially expressed genes using treatment as the main factor. However many genes differed between strains.
Authors:
Samuel J Harp, Mariangela Martini, Will Rosenow, Larry D Mesner, Hugh Johnson, Charles R Farber, Emilie F Rissman
GeneWeaver