Drug Naïve DO mice were tested for open field, light dark, hole board, novelty place preference before collecting the striatum. RNA-Seq data was analyzed with WGCNA using a soft thresholding power of 3 selected using the WGCNA scale-free topology R2 threshold of 0.9, signed network with a minimum module size of 30, correlation type is bicor, used numeric labels.
Analysis using RNA-seq of FACS-purified oligodendrocytes revealed a large cohort of morphine-regulated genes. In addition, to investigate cell-type-specific opioid responses, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of the nucleus accumbens of mice following acute morphine treatment. Differential expression analysis uncovered unique morphine-dependent transcriptional responses by oligodendrocytes and astrocytes.
Authors:
Denis Avey, Sumithra Sankararaman, Aldrin K Y Yim, Ruteja Barve, Jeffrey Milbrandt, Robi D Mitra
Differential gene expression in nucleus accumbens somatostatin interneurons_cocaine_mice_pvalue
Description:
To characterize transcriptional alterations that cocaine induces in these cells, we perform cell type-specific RNA-sequencing on FACS-isolated nuclei of somatostatin interneurons and identified 1100 DETs enriched for processes related to neural plasticity. To profile the entire (non poly-A selected) transcriptome of NAc somatostatin interneurons, we generated a transgenic reporter line (SST-TLG498 mice) to label the nuclei of these cells with a modified form of EGFP that is retained in the nuclear membrane (EGFP-F)22, enabling their isolation from NAc dissections using FACS. We succeeded in FACS-isolating nuclei suitable for RNA-sequencing from individual SST-TLG498 mice. We proceeded with differential expression analysis of the RNA-sequencing data to identify differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) in NAc somatostatin interneurons in response to repeated cocaine exposure: 778 transcripts were upregulated by cocaine and 322 were downregulated.
Authors:
Efrain A Ribeiro, Marine Salery, Joseph R Scarpa, Erin S Calipari, Peter J Hamilton, Stacy M Ku, Hope Kronman, Immanuel Purushothaman, Barbara Juarez, Mitra Heshmati, Marie Doyle, Casey Lardner, Dominicka Burek, Ana Strat, Stephen Pirpinias, Ezekiell Mouzon, Ming-Hu Han, Rachael L Neve, Rosemary C Bagot, Andrew Kasarskis, Ja Wook Koo, Eric J Nestler
DEG effect of brain region 72hrs post-CIE (C57 and D2)_pvalue
Description:
Male C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice (10 weeks old upon arrival) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and assigned to either the air control or CIE group (N = 1 per strain/ treatment). Treatment was coded as 0 for AIR and 1 for CIE, 0 for B6 and 1 for D2. Regions were collapsed into three groups based on the PCA clustering and coded as 0 for hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 regions), 1 for cortex (Prl, ILC, and VCX), and 2 for the remaining subcortical and limbic and mesolimbic tissue (VTA, NAc, NAs, DMS, CeA, and BST). The final data set included 11 brain regions and 87 samples. Mice were allowed to self-administer alcohol (15% v/v vs. water) for 2 h a day (5 days a week) 6 weeks prior to treatment in order to establish baseline consumption. Access to 15% alcohol versus water started 30 min prior to the start of the dark cycle. Following establishment of baseline drinking, two male mice representative of each strain were separated into two groups to be exposed to either weekly cycles of CIE exposure (CIE group) or air control (AIR group) exposure. Mice assigned to the CIE treatment group were exposed to alcohol vapor for 16 h a day followed by 8 h of withdrawal for 4 days. Following the fourth vapor exposure, mice were given a 72-h abstinence period before resuming ethanol intake in the home cage for 5 days. Mice in the AIR control treatment group were similarly treated but exposed only to air in the inhalation chambers. This pattern of CIE or air control exposure followed by 5 days of ethanol self-administration was repeated for four cycles. A fifth cycle of CIE (or air) exposure followed the fourth ethanol intake evaluation period, and brain tissue was collected 72 h after the last cycle ended. To capture expression patterns due to region, strain, and treatment or their interactions, we applied a linear model to the expression data: y ∼ Treatment + Strain + Tissue + Treatment*Strain + Treatment*Region (Supplemental Table 4).
Authors:
Megan K Mulligan, Khyobeni Mozhui, Ashutosh K Pandey, Maren L Smith, Suzhen Gong, Jesse Ingels, Michael F Miles, Marcelo F Lopez, Lu Lu, Robert W Williams
DEG effect of brain region 72hrs post-CIE (C57 and D2) (p < 0.01)_pvalue
Description:
Male C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice (10 weeks old upon arrival) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and assigned to either the air control or CIE group (N = 1 per strain/ treatment). Treatment was coded as 0 for AIR and 1 for CIE, 0 for B6 and 1 for D2. Regions were collapsed into three groups based on the PCA clustering and coded as 0 for hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 regions), 1 for cortex (Prl, ILC, and VCX), and 2 for the remaining subcortical and limbic and mesolimbic tissue (VTA, NAc, NAs, DMS, CeA, and BST). The final data set included 11 brain regions and 87 samples. Mice were allowed to self-administer alcohol (15% v/v vs. water) for 2 h a day (5 days a week) 6 weeks prior to treatment in order to establish baseline consumption. Access to 15% alcohol versus water started 30 min prior to the start of the dark cycle. Following establishment of baseline drinking, two male mice representative of each strain were separated into two groups to be exposed to either weekly cycles of CIE exposure (CIE group) or air control (AIR group) exposure. Mice assigned to the CIE treatment group were exposed to alcohol vapor for 16 h a day followed by 8 h of withdrawal for 4 days. Following the fourth vapor exposure, mice were given a 72-h abstinence period before resuming ethanol intake in the home cage for 5 days. Mice in the AIR control treatment group were similarly treated but exposed only to air in the inhalation chambers. This pattern of CIE or air control exposure followed by 5 days of ethanol self-administration was repeated for four cycles. A fifth cycle of CIE (or air) exposure followed the fourth ethanol intake evaluation period, and brain tissue was collected 72 h after the last cycle ended. To capture expression patterns due to region, strain, and treatment or their interactions, we applied a linear model to the expression data: y ∼ Treatment + Strain + Tissue + Treatment*Strain + Treatment*Region (Supplemental Table 4). At a nominal p value (p < 0.01), most expression differences are due to the effect of region (5464 unique genes) or strain (1111 unique genes). Differences due to effect of region or strain are reflected in this gene set (p < 0.01).
Authors:
Megan K Mulligan, Khyobeni Mozhui, Ashutosh K Pandey, Maren L Smith, Suzhen Gong, Jesse Ingels, Michael F Miles, Marcelo F Lopez, Lu Lu, Robert W Williams
GeneWeaver