The current study used two inbred mouse strains, C57BL/6 J and A/J, to investigate the genetics of behavioral responses to fentanyl. Mice were tested for conditioned place preference and fentanyl-induced locomotor activity. C57BL/6J mice formed a conditioned place preference to fentanyl injections and fentanyl increased their activity. Neither effect was noted in A/J mice. We conducted RNA-sequencing on the nucleus accumbens of mice used for fentanyl-induced locomotor activity. Surprisingly, we noted few differentially expressed genes using treatment as the main factor. However many genes differed between strains.
Authors:
Samuel J Harp, Mariangela Martini, Will Rosenow, Larry D Mesner, Hugh Johnson, Charles R Farber, Emilie F Rissman
Ethanol Induced Hypothermia Chr# 7 rs13479153(25722935) with right flanking marker rs3700068(4187548) and left marker rs3716088(140189839). This was mapped in 300 + (b6x129)F2 mice.
Average rotarod training latency Chr# 7 mCV23423763(68111945) with right flanking marker rs3700068(4187548) and left marker rs3663988(146505067). This was mapped in 300 + (b6x129)F2 mice.
Christopher A Cassa, Donate Weghorn, Daniel J Balick, Daniel M Jordan, David Nusinow, Kaitlin E Samocha, Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Daniel G MacArthur, Mark J Daly, David R Beier, Shamil R Sunyaev
Christopher A Cassa, Donate Weghorn, Daniel J Balick, Daniel M Jordan, David Nusinow, Kaitlin E Samocha, Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Daniel G MacArthur, Mark J Daly, David R Beier, Shamil R Sunyaev
Christopher A Cassa, Donate Weghorn, Daniel J Balick, Daniel M Jordan, David Nusinow, Kaitlin E Samocha, Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Daniel G MacArthur, Mark J Daly, David R Beier, Shamil R Sunyaev
This gene set describes genes that are down-regulated in children with Multisystem inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MISC-C) versus healthy controls using RNAseq analysis. The genes were filtered for a p-value < 0.05 and a log fold-change of greater than 1.0 given in supplemental table 7. Genes were entered into GeneWeaver using the reported EnsEMBL identifiers. Values are log-fold change.
Authors:
Noam D Beckmann, Phillip H Comella, Esther Cheng, Lauren Lepow, Aviva G Beckmann, Scott R Tyler, Konstantinos Mouskas, Nicole W Simons, Gabriel E Hoffman, Nancy J Francoeur, Diane Marie Del Valle, Gurpawan Kang, Anh Do, Emily Moya, Lillian Wilkins, Jessica Le Berichel, Christie Chang, Robert Marvin, Sharlene Calorossi, Alona Lansky, Laura Walker, Nancy Yi, Alex Yu, Jonathan Chung, Matthew Hartnett, Melody Eaton, Sandra Hatem, Hajra Jamal, Alara Akyatan, Alexandra Tabachnikova, Lora E Liharska, Liam Cotter, Brian Fennessy, Akhil Vaid, Guillermo Barturen, Hardik Shah, Ying-Chih Wang, Shwetha Hara Sridhar, Juan Soto, Swaroop Bose, Kent Madrid, Ethan Ellis, Elyze Merzier, Konstantinos Vlachos, Nataly Fishman, Manying Tin, Melissa Smith, Hui Xie, Manishkumar Patel, Kai Nie, Kimberly Argueta, Jocelyn Harris, Neha Karekar, Craig Batchelor, Jose Lacunza, Mahlet Yishak, Kevin Tuballes, Ieisha Scott, Arvind Kumar, Suraj Jaladanki, Charuta Agashe, Ryan Thompson, Evan Clark, Bojan Losic, Lauren Peters, , Panagiotis Roussos, Jun Zhu, Wenhui Wang, Andrew Kasarskis, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Girish Nadkarni, Dusan Bogunovic, Cordelia Elaiho, Sandeep Gangadharan, George Ofori-Amanfo, Kasey Alesso-Carra, Kenan Onel, Karen M Wilson, Carmen Argmann, Supinda Bunyavanich, Marta E Alarcón-Riquelme, Thomas U Marron, Adeeb Rahman, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, Sacha Gnjatic, Bruce D Gelb, Miriam Merad, Robert Sebra, Eric E Schadt, Alexander W Charney
Data from GEO GSE194368 and analyzed using GEO2R, only top gene shown. Authors identified transcriptional adaptations of GR signaling in the amygdala of humans with OUD. Thus, GRs, their coregulators and downstream systems may represent viable therapeutic targets to treat the “stress side” of OUD.
Authors:
Stephanie A Carmack, Janaina C M Vendruscolo, M Adrienne McGinn, Jorge Miranda-Barrientos, Vez Repunte-Canonigo, Gabriel D Bosse, Daniele Mercatelli, Federico M Giorgi, Yu Fu, Anthony J Hinrich, Francine M Jodelka, Karen Ling, Robert O Messing, Randall T Peterson, Frank Rigo, Scott Edwards, Pietro P Sanna, Marisela Morales, Michelle L Hastings, George F Koob, Leandro F Vendruscolo
Differential gene expression between CS15 and CS22 - Adj-P value
Description:
Human craniofacial tissues were collected from the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology (HDBR). Donations of tissue to HDBR are made under-informed ethical consent with Research Tissue Bank ethical approval by women undergoing termination of pregnancy. Gene expression profiles were generated from multiple biological replicates of primary craniofacial (CF) tissue from Carnegie Stages (CS) of the embryonic period, CS13, CS14, CS17, CS17 and CS22. Here the differential expression comparison between CS15 and CS22 is shown. Gene expressions values, Ensembl Gene ids and the corresponding Adjusted P value are presented. UBERON:0015789, cranial or facial muscle.
Authors:
Tara N Yankee, Sungryong Oh, Emma Wentworth Winchester, Andrea Wilderman, Kelsey Robinson, Tia Gordon, Jill A Rosenfeld, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Daryl A Scott, Elizabeth J Leslie, Justin Cotney
Differential gene expression between CS13 and CS22 - Log2FC
Description:
Human craniofacial tissues were collected from the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology (HDBR). Donations of tissue to HDBR are made under-informed ethical consent with Research Tissue Bank ethical approval by women undergoing termination of pregnancy. Gene expression profiles were generated from multiple biological replicates of primary craniofacial (CF) tissue from Carnegie Stages (CS) of the embryonic period, CS13, CS14, CS17, CS17, and CS22. Here the differential expression comparison between CS13 and CS22 is shown. Gene expressions values with log to the base 2, FC are presented with P-Adj <0.05. UBERON:0015789, cranial or facial muscle.
Authors:
Tara N Yankee, Sungryong Oh, Emma Wentworth Winchester, Andrea Wilderman, Kelsey Robinson, Tia Gordon, Jill A Rosenfeld, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Daryl A Scott, Elizabeth J Leslie, Justin Cotney
Differential gene expression between CS13 and CS22 - Adj-P value
Description:
Human craniofacial tissues were collected from the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology (HDBR). Donations of tissue to HDBR are made under-informed ethical consent with Research Tissue Bank ethical approval by women undergoing termination of pregnancy. Gene expression profiles were generated from multiple biological replicates of primary craniofacial (CF) tissue from Carnegie Stages (CS) of the embryonic period, CS13, CS14, CS17, CS17 and CS22. Here the differential expression comparison between CS13 and CS22 is shown. Gene expressions values, Ensembl Gene ids and the corresponding Adjusted P value are presented. UBERON:0015789, cranial or facial muscle.
Authors:
Tara N Yankee, Sungryong Oh, Emma Wentworth Winchester, Andrea Wilderman, Kelsey Robinson, Tia Gordon, Jill A Rosenfeld, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Daryl A Scott, Elizabeth J Leslie, Justin Cotney
Differential gene expression between CS14 and CS22 - Adj-P value
Description:
Human craniofacial tissues were collected from the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology (HDBR). Donations of tissue to HDBR are made under-informed ethical consent with Research Tissue Bank ethical approval by women undergoing termination of pregnancy. Gene expression profiles were generated from multiple biological replicates of primary craniofacial (CF) tissue from Carnegie Stages (CS) of the embryonic period, CS13, CS14, CS17, CS17 and CS22. Here the differential expression comparison between CS14 and CS22 is shown. Gene expressions values, Ensembl Gene ids and the corresponding Adjusted P value are presented. UBERON:0015789, cranial or facial muscle.
Authors:
Tara N Yankee, Sungryong Oh, Emma Wentworth Winchester, Andrea Wilderman, Kelsey Robinson, Tia Gordon, Jill A Rosenfeld, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Daryl A Scott, Elizabeth J Leslie, Justin Cotney
Differential gene expression between CS14 and CS22 - Adj-P value
Description:
Human craniofacial tissues were collected from the Joint MRC/Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology (HDBR). Donations of tissue to HDBR are made under-informed ethical consent with Research Tissue Bank ethical approval by women undergoing termination of pregnancy. Gene expression profiles were generated from multiple biological replicates of primary craniofacial (CF) tissue from Carnegie Stages (CS) of the embryonic period, CS13, CS14, CS17, CS17 and CS22. Here the differential expression comparison between CS14 and CS22 is shown. Gene expressions values, Ensembl Gene ids and the corresponding Adjusted P value are presented. UBERON:0015789, cranial or facial muscle.
Authors:
Tara N Yankee, Sungryong Oh, Emma Wentworth Winchester, Andrea Wilderman, Kelsey Robinson, Tia Gordon, Jill A Rosenfeld, Jennifer VanOudenhove, Daryl A Scott, Elizabeth J Leslie, Justin Cotney
To monitor the expression levels of a large number of genes and to identify genes not previously implicated in traumatic brain injury pathophysiology, a high-density oligonucleotide array containing 8,800 genes was interrogated. RNA samples were prepared from ipsilateral hippocampi 3 hr and 24 hr following lateral cortical impact injury and compared to samples from sham-operated controls.
Authors:
Matzilevich DA, Rall JM, Moore AN, Grill RJ, Dash PK
Hippocampus Gene Expression Correlates for CONSTRICT measured in BXD RI Females & Males obtained using GeneNetwork Hippocampus Consortium M430v2 (Jun06) RMA. The CONSTRICT measures Morphine Response Severity of abdominal constriction under the domain Morphine. The correlates were thresholded at a p-value of less than 0.001.
Authors:
Philip VM, Duvvuru S, Gomero B, Ansah TA, Blaha CD, Cook MN, Hamre KM, Lariviere WR, Matthews DB, Mittleman G, Goldowitz D, Chesler EJ
QTL for METH responses for body temperature on Chr12 at Mox2 (45.22 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
METH responses for body temperature spans 20.22 - 70.22 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr12. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
QTL for cocaine induced activation on Chr12 at D12Xrf564 (55.38 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
cocaine induced activation spans 30.38 - 80.38 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr12. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
QTL for high-dose ethanol actions on Chr18 at D18Mit7 (73.95 Mbp , Build 37)
Description:
high-dose ethanol actions spans 48.95 - 98.95 Mbp (NCBI Build 37) on Chr18. This interval was obtained by using an interval width of 25 Mbp around the peak marker (Build 37, MGI, http://informatics.jax.org).
Authors:
Erwin VG, Markel PD, Johnson TE, Gehle VM, Jones BC
Chronic cocaine - Cocaine-paired (conditioned place preference) vs. Control (saline or cocaine-non-paired) DNA microarray All genes on microarray presented After the pre-conditioning phase where animals were allowed access to either compartment for 15 minutes for 4 consecutive days, the conditioning phase for the cocaine-paired groups and cocaine non-paired groups began, consisting of eight subsequent daily sessions. For both groups, cocaine (10 mg / kg) or saline injections were administered on alternate days. For the cocaine-paired groups, rats were immediately placed in one of the two compartments for 30 min with the door in place restricting a z transformation followed by z test and anova followed by Student-Newman-Keuls' post hoc test. Gene expression profile was assessed 24 h after the last conditioning session that corresponded to 48 h after last cocaine exposure, when drug has been eliminated from the body and transient transcriptional changes are likely to be minimal. Therefore, changes in gene expression at this time-point are likely to reflect longer lasting adaptations that may account for maintenance of cocaine-induced memories. The complete lists of normalized gene expression values for the hippocampus of saline-treated, cocaine non-paired and cocaine-paired groups are presented. Analyses revealed that 214 transcripts were differentially regulated in the hippocampus of cocaine-paired rats vs. non-paired and saline-treated controls. Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference caused significant increases in the expression of 151 genes and caused decreases in the expression of 63 genes. (NIF Table ID 130.1 [83])
Authors:
Krasnova IN, Li SM, Wood WH, McCoy MT, Prabhu VV, Becker KG, Katz JL, Cadet JL
Chronic cocaine - Cocaine-paired (conditioned place preference) vs. Control (saline or cocaine-non-paired) DNA microarray All genes on microarray presented After the pre-conditioning phase where animals were allowed access to either compartment for 15 minutes for 4 consecutive days, the conditioning phase for the cocaine-paired groups and cocaine non-paired groups began, consisting of eight subsequent daily sessions. For both groups, cocaine (10 mg / kg) or saline injections were administered on alternate days. For the cocaine-paired groups, rats were immediately placed in one of the two compartments for 30 min with the door in place restricting a z transformation followed by z test and anova followed by Student-Newman-Keuls' post hoc test. Gene expression profile was assessed 24 h after the last conditioning session that corresponded to 48 h after last cocaine exposure, when drug has been eliminated from the body and transient transcriptional changes are likely to be minimal. Therefore, changes in gene expression at this time-point are likely to reflect longer lasting adaptations that may account for maintenance of cocaine-induced memories. The complete lists of normalized gene expression values for the frontal cortex of saline-treated, cocaine non-paired and cocaine-paired groups are presented. Differences in the expression of 39 transcripts in the frontal cortex were related to the conditioned place preference paradigm. These include increases in the level of 22 genes and decreases in 17 genes. (NIF Table ID 130.3 [83.5])
Authors:
Krasnova IN, Li SM, Wood WH, McCoy MT, Prabhu VV, Becker KG, Katz JL, Cadet JL
None - Basal gene expression profiles between C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, 129P3/J, and SWR/J strains DNA microarray Change in gene expression Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). 3,457 probe sets (corresponded to 2,870 different transcripts) with significant inter-strain differences (differ by at least 1.2-fold) - False discovery rate [FDR] < 1%, , rank > 3. Such a large disparity in the mouse striatal transcriptome was estimated by comparing nine array replicates prepared per strain from all of the treatment groups. More than half of the identified probe sets exhibited markedly significant results (1,735 with rank > 7). (NIF Method ID 84.1)
Authors:
Korostynski M, Piechota M, Kaminska D, Solecki W, Przewlocki R
GeneWeaver